Profit in Line with the Market

Does your company generate a market-driven rate of return? Companies, especially SMEs (small and medium enterprises), find here the calculation basis (figures for German-speaking countries and the US). Does your company generate a profit in line with the market?

What is market-driven profit?

When investing your money in a company, you ask yourself whether this company achieves a profit in line with the market. For this to be the case, profit must correspond to the return that can be earned when investing in other companies with the same level of risk.

Consequently, a company should generate at least enough profit to cover the interest requirements of the lenders of the borrowed capital and an adequate return on capital to the owners of the equity provided. The part of the assets financed with “interest-costing capital” must earn the interest that meets the interest requirements of all capital providers. It is referred to as capital employed and results when free capital is deducted from the assets required for operations. Free capital is that part of debt which is available to the company without paying interest, i.e. debt to suppliers, advance payments from customers and non-interest-bearing provisions.

Profit in Line with the Market
Profit in Line with the Market

For the total capital employed, an interest rate is sought which should remain for the investors after deduction of all costs, i.e. including income taxes. This risk-based and thus market-based interest rate is referred to as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).

Calculation of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

Four variables are required to determine the WACC:

    1. the cost of equity,
    2. the cost of debt (capital)
    3. the income tax rate, and
    4. the ratio of debt to equity (gearing).
Determining the cost of equity

From the owner’s perspective, the cost of equity represents the return (yield) he would earn if he invested his money in an alternative investment of equal risk and duration. This means that the shareholder would like to receive at least the risk-free interest rate plus a risk premium. Since equity is a long-term form of financing, the risk-free interest rate of a long-term form of investment must be applied. In practice this is often the interest rate for 10-30-year AAA-rated government bonds.

Tip: Use the risk-free interest rate from the annual KPMG Cost of Capital Study. In this study, it is given as 0.40% for 2020 and for Germany. (Internet links at the end of this post).

There will hardly be an investor who would make his money available to a company at the current risk-free interest rate of 0.40%. Since the owners share the complete risk of loss of the company, they demand a risk premium.

It is obvious that equity investors again look to the capital market to determine the risk premium rate by analyzing what return a certain broad stock index, e.g. CDAX, S&P 500, MSCI World Index, yields. The difference between the return of the chosen benchmark stock market and the risk-free rate represents the market risk premium that an average investor demands when investing in a stock.

Tip: Use the market risk premium from KPMG’s annual cost of capital study. This is given as 7.20% in the KPMG Cost of Capital Study 2020 for Germany.

The market risk premium represents the risk premium for the entire market. It is too flat for a specific company. Therefore, it has to be corrected depending on whether the company has a higher or lower risk than the average stock market. This correction factor can in turn be derived from the stock market and is called a beta factor. In practice, beta factors are calculated for different industries. The cost of equity for an average German company (beta factor = 1.00) is therefore 0.40% + 7.20% = 7.60%. For internationally operating companies, it is common to add a country risk premium to the cost of equity.

Tip: The industry beta factors can be found in the annual KPMG Cost of Capital Study. Use the “average levered beta factors by industry”. When in doubt, use the beta factor for an average company, which is 1.00. For those who want to know more, refer to our book 360°-MANAGEMENT, Appendix B (in the Bibliography), and the literature cited there.

Determining the cost of debt and the income tax rate

The cost of debt is usually the interest that the company is currently paying on long-term debt. It should be noted that the interest rates applied to borrowed capital must always be higher than the long-term risk-free interest rate plus a risk-adequate premium (spread) for the credit default risk (depending on the rating class of the company). Since interest on debt is tax-deductible and thus reduces tax expense, the cost of debt is adjusted downward by the tax rate.

According to the KPMG Cost of Capital Study 2020, the average cost of debt used for Germany was 2.20%. The average tax rate for Germany 2020 is 30.00% (KPMG Corporate Tax Rate for 2011-2021). The net after-tax cost of debt for an average German company is therefore 1.54%.

Tip: For a rough calculation, divide the total interest expense by the interest costing debt. For taxes, use the income tax rate you pay.

Determination of Debt

The final step in calculating the WACC is to determine the ratio of equity to debt. Since the market value of a company is the sum of the market value of the interest-bearing debt and the market value of the equity, the proportions must be determined at market values.

In practice, the book value of debt is usually used as the market value of interest-bearing debt. The market value of equity (shareholder value) is relatively easy to determine for listed companies by multiplying the number of shares by the stock market price.

Note: According to the KPMG Cost of Capital Study 2020, the average debt to equity-ratio used is 28.90% (w). This corresponds to an equity ratio of 77.58% (u).

Tip: For simplicity, subtract interest-bearing debt from capital employed to get the equity. The equity ratio is the ratio of equity to capital employed.

Determination of WACC and Target ROCE

Based on the previous calculations, the WACC rounded to half percentage points for an average German company is 6.00% (y). Since ROCE is calculated on the basis of EBIT and is therefore a pre-tax figure, the WACC still has to be corrected for the tax portion. The target ROCE for an average German company rounded to half percentage points is therefore 9.00%.

Note: For 2013, the author calculated an average Target ROCE of 10.00% for Germany. The target ROCE has remained relatively stable. For Switzerland, the target ROCE is 7.00% and for Austria 9.00%. The Target ROCE was in the US 7% for 2020, using the calculations of Prof. Damodaran (cf.: https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/data.html).

Tip: Round the WACC and Target ROCE to the nearest half percentage point and only make adjustments if the cost of capital has changed by more than one percentage point.

Was an Excess Economic Benefit achieved?

To determine the target ROCE of a specific company, the requirements of the capital market are applied to the company to be assessed. The profitability achieved by the company is compared with the risk-weighted market expectations.

The target ROCE is thus a hurdle rate, used to assess the profitability of the company as a whole in comparison with the equity market, but also serves as a yardstick for assessing strategies and investments. For this reason, the target ROCE must be an integral part of the corporate financial concept and of the top control “Profitability”.

Enough EBIT achieved?

In the example, the company has achieved an EBIT of 100,000 (f). If the EBIT is divided by the capital employed (c), the realized ROCE is 10.00% (k). The company thus achieved a higher return in the last period than the 9.00% target ROCE required by the market (aa). If the target ROCE is multiplied by the capital employed (c), the target EBIT is 90,000 (l). An “Excess Economic Benefit” of 10,000 (m) was generated. This is the most important parameter for assessing management performance in terms of profitability. The ” Excess Economic Benefit” shows the increase in value of a period as an absolute amount.

Management has three decisive levers at its disposal to increase the “Excess Economic Benefit”. Firstly, to generate as high an EBIT as possible, secondly, to require as few assets as possible for this, and thirdly, to finance the assets required for operation with as much free capital as possible. A modern management accounting system supports managers in this.

Download this Excel model free of charge under “Free Downloads”. To adapt it to your own figures, please enter the password shown in the exhibit above.

The Cost of Capital Study 2020 – KPMG Germany can be downloaded here.

This post is an updated summary of Appendix B in the book 360°-MANAGEMENT (by L. Rieder and M. Berger-Vogel, see Bibliography).

Investment in Handling Robots

Logoof Schuetzengarten Brewery

«Schuetzengarten Brewery in St. Gallen/Switzerland (Ltd.) is the oldest independent and private brewery in Switzerland. It was founded in 1779. Despite cutthroat competition and market domination by a few large international breweries it manages to gain market share while remaining financially successful in the long term.

There are two main reasons for this development:

    • The product range is continuously adapted to new customer needs; at international competitions, the brewery regularly wins top awards for its new products.
    • The productivity of the operational processes is continuously improved in all areas, which naturally has a positive effect on profitability.
Horse driven delivery by Schuetzengarten around 1960
Horse driven delivery by Schuetzengarten around 1960

Investment Calculation for Handling Robots

In order to improve productivity, it had to be decided whether the investment in two handling robots for the barrel cleaning and filling would be worthwhile and how many years the benefits would have to flow until the cost savings would cover the investment and the respective interest costs.

Dynamic investment calculation is the instrument for the financial assessment of this decision.

Schuetzengarten Ltd. wanted to achieve the following benefits by using robots:

    1. Prevention of long-term physical damage to the employees working in the keg filling department (weight of the barrels (KEG) and number of movements).
    2. To proof pressure-safe filling, testing and sealing (quality assurance).
    3. To have sufficient filling capacity at all times, even for seasonal consumption peaks (at large events, beer is mainly served open, i.e. from KEGS)
    4. To be able to electronically measure the units of output provided and the condition of the equipment (preventive maintenance).
    5. To produce at a lower cost per output unit (different KEG sizes).

The investment amounts and the current expenditures for the operation (mainly electricity consumption and equipment maintenance) came from the suppliers’ quotations, the costs of the current employees in the KEG filling plant came from the cost center accounting or from the payroll administration. The qualitative and capacity requirements of points 2. – 4. are mandatory criteria to be covered in the offers of the potential suppliers. Higher fees for accident insurance and public liability insurance could possibly be added. However, this was not the case in the example described.

Investment and running costs

For the preparation of the decision, the controller of the brewery collected the following data:

The planned useful life of the investment is 15 years. The cash flows are divided into investment amounts to be paid at the beginning of the investment and the expected annual expenditures. The investment amount is posted to fixed assets and depreciated beginning in year 1 of use.

Expected cash flows for the use of handling robots
Expected cash flows for the use of handling robots

This overview shows already that the robot installation will be completely paid back after about three years, but can then be used for many more years.

In most companies, various investment projects with different planned useful lives compete for approval at the same time. To make the different durations and investment amounts of the projects comparable to each other, the time value of money has to be taken into account. The dynamic investment calculation achieves this by discounting the annual cash flows to the starting point.

The investments and the current expenditures from above were entered into our generally applicable dynamic investment calculation model and led to the following result (the Excel model can be downloaded here together with the explanation of the application; all yellow fields can be changed):

Investment Calculation for Handling Robots
Investment Calculation for Handling Robots

If a target return of 10% before interest and income taxes is applied, it can be seen from (8) that the investment is paid back after two years.

Determining the required ROCE

To determine the target rate of return to be applied, it is advisable to take the financing structure of the company into account and to start from the interest-costing capital (capital employed). The 10% assumed in the investment calculation model above can be adjusted in the model to suit the specific company.

An international comparison shows that, in the long term, a company must generate an annual return on capital employed (ROCE) of around 10% so that shareholders are willing to continue investing their money into the company (see the derivation and empirical findings for various countries in the book “360°-Management for all Functions and Management Levels Appendix B, p.243 ff.“).

In the numerical example, an EBIT (earnings before interest and income taxes) of 100 is achieved with an (operating) balance sheet total of 1,000, which corresponds to a ROI of 10%. Accounts payable and customer prepayments do not cost any interest, which means that the interest-costing assets amount to 900. The net capital employed thus generates a ROCE of 11.11%. The EBIT is used to pay interest on borrowings of 50 and income taxes of 10. The profit remaining for the shareholders is 40 and the equity capital used for this is 400. The return on equity is therefore 10%.

From ROCE to ROE
From ROCE to ROE

Investment calculation = pure cash flow analysis

When applying the investment calculation model, it is important to note that only the cash inflows and outflows expected as a result of an investment decision are taken into account. Depreciation has no place in an investment calculation since the expenditure for the investment is already included. Lower tax payments, if any, are also not relevant for investment decisions, since the definitive tax burden is only calculated on the basis of the profits actually incurred in a reporting year.

The investment calculation model presented is suitable for several purposes:

    • Estimating the financial impact of strategic and medium-term operational decisions
    • Comparison of the financial impact of competing investment projects and selection of those to be implemented
    • Basis for the preparation of the medium-term (strategic) investment plan.

 Conclusion

The “Schuetzengarten-Robots” are in operation. Watch the video 

The investment decision was right, the expected benefits are continuously realized. The brewery has improved its competitiveness.

Your SCHüga Beer
Your SCHüga Beer

We wish the brewery continued sustainable implementation success.